Easter Reading

March 28th, 2005

Yes, I know it’s after Easter, but Ravi Zacharias’s website has some good stuff:

A Lamb Slain:

The depravity of man is at once the most unpopular of the Christian doctrines and the most empirically verifiable. We have within us a basic sense of our desperate condition. We are aware, or often reminded, that we not quite what we were intended to be. Something went wrong, something we yearn to see made right, but somehow find ourselves incapable of restoring.

Starting From An Empty Tomb:

In the book The Gospel in a Pluralist Society, Lesslie Newbigin observes, “It is obvious that the story of the empty tomb cannot be fitted into our contemporary worldview, or indeed into any worldview except one of which it is the starting point.” You can’t have Buddha and an empty tomb; you can’t have Western Imperialism and an empty tomb; you can’t have an innocuous Jesus and an empty tomb. Many have tried to fit these things together as a puzzle, but the power of the empty tomb repels anything that competes with it.

And we’re waiting

March 28th, 2005

Got to the airport just after 7 for our flight out at 8:03. Met by a crowd in front of the Delta comment, all flights delayed.

Now we’re hanging out in the lobby. Our flight from here to Atlanta leaves at 1o:20, we’re supposed to get to New Orleans at 12:37. We shall see.

On the plus side, I’ll get a chance to update my website 8)

The Da Vinci Code

March 22nd, 2005

First Baptist of Woodstock, Ga had a speaker back in october speaking on Deciphering the Da Vinci Code. (Windows media only, unfortunately) Don Elbourne has a post with a lot more information.

It’s important that Christians take the time to familiarize themselves with the facts about all this. It presents a great chance to engage people in conversation about the validity of the Christian faith.

Washington does not decide morality

March 22nd, 2005

Just saw that a judge will not order the reinsertion of Terri Schiavo’s feeding tube.

I’ve been asked about my opinion on this, but haven’t spoken about it with too many people. But since no one else seems to be holding back…

What bothers me is that people on all sides are missing what I see as the main issue (as if what I see is the most important thing). The idea of congress and the courts deciding these matters is ludicrous, but shows very well how we no longer have moral dilemmas but political ones.

And, from my understanding, both sides are guilty of bringing this on. Of course the parents are fighting, but from my reading the husband first asked the courts to make a decision.

The simple matter — in my mind, anyway — is that she is not brain dead. Vegetative state, whatever you want to call it, is not brain death. She does not respond as her parents claim; again, from my understanding, what you see on TV is not conistent, and sometimes she responds when there’s no one in the room, and this is natural for a vegetative state.

She is, however, breathing on her own. So we’re not talking about unhooking her from a life-support machine. We’re talking about starving her to death. The question, then, is this: “Is it ever moral to starve someone to death?” And I will answer, No.

To state that the feeding tube is all that’s keeping her alive is stupidly obvious. Of course the food is keeping her alive, food keeps everyone alive. That’s the same as saying “The oxygen in the air is allowing her to breathe.” Why not, then, put her in a room and suck all the oxygen out? Such a death would be as natural as one by starvation, for one can not live without breathing.

She is not being kept alive by artificial means, since feeding someone is a perfectly natural thing. Her desire (and I think this is well established) to not be kept alive on life-support machines is moot: She is not being kept alive by a machine that breathes for her or that pumps her blood. We’re being asked to have watch her starve to death.

This touches on to what I have said before: Why does it not bother the Christians who are rightly fighting this that many of these same congressmen, and certainly the president, allow torture and abuse that shows the lie to their stance on the sanctity of human life? This is what happens when we allow politicians to decide morals, and abdicate our right to state what God’s Word tells us.

Uplifting and Encouraging DRM

March 21st, 2005

We got our His Radio promotional CD today, complete with dire FBI warnings against copying it, and not-so-fine print on the back telling me:

Licensed for promotional use only. Not a sale. This CD cannot be transferred without consent of the record company and must be returned on demand. Use or retention of the CD signifies acceptance of this license.

What an absolute crock. So you sent me this as a “thank you” but you control what I do with it, and if you demand it back I have to hand it over?

Well, the copy protection doesn’t work. I’m considering handing the stupid thing over and telling them to keep their bogus appreciation.

Spell with flickr

March 14th, 2005

Spell with flickr